Capture a delivery constraint
Consider a field for the number of locations or the expected service start window. Confirm who updates it when the scope changes.
Choose CRM fields that carry useful context across the handoff and give managers something worth measuring.
Explore the field checklistSales may know that a prospect has multiple locations or an upcoming contract renewal. If that context stays in meeting notes, the person preparing delivery has to find it again.
Custom fields can make selected details easier to find and report on. But every field asks someone to enter and maintain information. Start with the decisions your team actually makes, not every detail it could collect.
Before adding a custom field, name its user, its decision and the moment it needs to be current. Use this checklist during CRM selection or a field review.
Consider a field for the number of locations or the expected service start window. Confirm who updates it when the scope changes.
Evaluate whether an owner and a next-step date can be recorded consistently. Agree on what an overdue next step means before reporting on it.
Consider a handoff status with clear definitions. Keep detailed technical notes in an appropriate record rather than forcing them into a short field.
If no one can name a decision, owner or update point for a proposed field, leave it out for now. Review existing fields for the same overlap before adding another.
A useful view should lead to a question someone can act on. When evaluating CRM analytics, ask whether fields can be filtered, grouped and reviewed with the definitions your team uses.
Explore a view by handoff status and owner. Managers can use it to ask who needs help moving a record forward.
Look for a way to review next-step dates by owner and stage. Check how missing dates appear, not just overdue ones.
Consider a completeness view for the few fields required at handoff. Define when each field should be filled so gaps have meaning.
A CRM rarely holds every operational detail. Map the handoff between sales and service before evaluating how records might pass between systems.
For each shared detail, decide where it is first recorded and which record should be treated as current.
Compare field names, allowed values and ownership across systems. Ask vendors how conflicting or missing values would be handled.
Walk through a changed scope or an incomplete handoff. Establish who notices the gap and who corrects it before relying on a report.
Bring sales and service together around a recent transition. List the questions that slowed it down, then use those questions to decide which fields and dashboard views deserve evaluation.
Return to the field checklist ↑